Thursday, April 17, 2008

'Theodacopulos,' by Nimrod






http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/remember_norman_and_bill


Hey, Taki, the nimrodniks you’ve put in charge of your site have fucked up your name on the left side.

Carry on, Oh gashhound, my gashhound.

Posted by Pat Ferbis on Apr 17, 2008.


Hey, Taki, the nimrodniks you’ve put in charge of your site have fucked up your name on the left side.

Carry on, oh gashhound, my gashhound.
Posted by Pat Ferbis on Apr 17, 2008.

Hey, Pretty Pat, you fucked up too! ‘O,’ itz!

Posted by Vanguard of the Trolletariat on Apr 17,

Zamfirak Loves Unaborted 'Lacks



http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/is_abortion_racist/


Abortion isn’t racist against blacks, if anything those who push abortion most are in general racist toward whites. It’s just that the ideas of leftism so dominate debate because of their control of the media and schools that people feel compelled to resort to liberal arguments. We can’t fight a war unless we paint it in terms of political correctness. Muslim terrorists lard their press releases with the sort of quasi-Marxism that has been flowing from our universities for decades, etc.

Posted by John Smith on Apr 16, 2008.


For all my sins, I do not envy them their moment at the “fearsome judgment seat of Christ.”
Posted by John Zmirak on Apr 16, 2008.

On the other hand, all dogs go to heaven. Good news for you, Greasy John.

Posted by R.C. Stove on Apr 17, 2008.


Zamfirak tootles, and the real world disappears. Ah, the Catholic pan flute. Who can resist its mellifluous waverings?

Quality and biology, as the papists insist, do not apply to people.

Hey, Zammy: How many abortion ‘doctors’ aren’t jewish?

Posted by Pete Moss on Apr 17, 2008.




Let’s face it. Everybody reading this site knows the more niggers aborted, the better for all us humans.

Niggers rape 40,000 white women a year. Taki has put out the word that this fact is NOT to be allowed on his site.

Why? Answer the question yourself.

Takimag is part of the controlled opposition to the ruling regime. It appears to be at odds with things as they are, yet in no serious particular does it

diverge from the rulers’ party line.

Readers ask time and time again what paleocons’ point is? What’s the mission of this site and this philosophy?

Never is this question answered because the answer would give the game away.

Takimag, Takimag
Just another useless
liberal rag.

As always, learn what Takimag wants hidden at Takimag 2.0

http://takimag.blogspot.com/

And remember what Joe Sobran said about professional conservatism:

“It was all a game; a way of making a living.”

John Zmirak opposes abortion. He just won’t tell you that it’s legal because jews dominate law schools and the media. Nor will he tell you that nearly all abortion providers are jews.

You see what Sobran meant?

Posted by M.I. on Apr 17, 2008.



I would like to take this opportunity to ask the young gentleman of nose whether he prefers to be referred to as a Chibrew or a Chike?

Posted by Lamont Snooley on Apr 17, 2008.



I would like to request of the Catholic gentlemen who frequent this site that they encourage my mistress to douche. It’s been months now. The purulent discharge here admitted, while impressive, in no way substitutes for the real thing. Thank you.

Posted by Sid's Cuntlips on Apr 17, 2008.

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Responses to Greasy John Zamfirak's Latest Pro-Black Asininity

Are blacks a collective postive or a collective negative? The answer is obvious. But a good Catholic knows never to pose the sensible question, always to move the question into la-la land, where everything is abstract and beautiful. Just as liberals separate liberation and voting from results, they separate abortion from the character of the pail people. It is one thing to abort a black. It is an entirely different thing to abort a White.

A good comment, not by us, gets some of the truth into the thread. Whether the post is let stand, of course, remains to be seen.

http://www.takimag.com/sniperstower/article/kill_the_poor/

Sorry, blacks in general have nothing to contribute to any kind of society I’d like to live in. 90% score lower than the average white on IQ scores and the very few that can succeed work towards making life easier for the rest of them, which means more crime, socialism and social engineering. And blacks aren’t only inferior in intelligence. Mark Levin’s book (http://www.amazon.com/Why-Race-Matters-Michael-Levin/dp/0965638359/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1208387986&sr=8-1) shows that blacks are also morally inferior by the standards of our society at least.

Anyway, the less blacks the better. I won’t miss those who contribute nothing to modern civilization and live as parasites, providing motivation for generation of do gooders to use government power to smother us all to death in the pursuit of their unatainable goal of equality.

Posted by Jason on Apr 16, 2008.

[Our post]

Are blacks a collective postive or a collective negative? The answer is obvious. But a good Catholic knows never to pose the sensible question, always to move the question into la-la land, where everything is abstract and perfect. Just as liberals separate liberation and voting and civil rights from results, they separate abortion from the character of the people in the pail. It is one thing to abort a black. It is an entirely different thing to abort a White. As they used to say, “Not everything with a face is human.”

The John Zmiraks of the world keep preening over their morals while outside in the real world, 37,000 White women are raped by unaborted blacks each year.

I understand that if those blacks be caught young and tutored in the ways of Jesus, these horrors will stop. I’m just sayin’…

Posted by Mark Twine on Apr 16, 2008.

Great Comments: Sempronius boots Patty Bukes

Sempronius

Where to begin? Buchanan the phoney Catholic and phoney “right wing extremist” has encountered some easy prey and hes not about to forego the opportunity to make shooting a squirrel seem like wrestling a lion.The modern Hercules will surely secure his place, if not on Olympus at least in suburban D.C..

There is nothing wrong with “elites”.In fact any sane person, much less a conservative, aknowledges as much and whats more welcomes it.Populist opposition to elitism is yesterdays Leftism,and yesterdays Leftism is todays Conservatism.

Therein lies a problem.

Degenerate Conservatism cant effectively oppose Leftism because its intellectual underpinnings are derived from the very tradition it makes a show of opposing.With the predictable result that it doesnt succeed in accomplishing much of anything,except providing careers for useless and worthless personages not unlike P.B..

The yokels out in the wilds of Pennsylvania are hardly an edifying sight.Understanding and sympathizing with their plight is assuredly correct and noble,but it is not primarily on their behalf nor for their benefit that we oppose THE GOOD TIDINGS of Leftism and its newest Kenyan-Indonesian Messiah.There is no little irony in the fact that The Kenyans mother came from regions no less despised and no less humiliated than the Province of Pennsylvania.

As I said, there is nothing wrong with elites.What passes for an elite today however is not a true elite but rather a degenerate epicene plutocracy.A greedy, stupid, ugly assortment of sorry specimens whos combined value isnt equal to a pile of refuse.

It is indicative of how low we have fallen that an African is putting on contemptuous airs, openly and without consequence towards white serfs.The proper rejoinder to the Kenyans provocation is to point out that however mean and ignoble Heartland peasants may be, they are still far and away preferable to the simians that infest our urban wastelands not to mention the savages of his beloved Africa.

But Conservatism cant do that you see.That would be racist and therefore unchristian and unamerican.

Unbiblical you might say.

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=568#comments

____________________

[also good]

The elites have power because — and only because — the people have accepted a servile status in exchange for security & benefits.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Solid Comments

John Smith

The “them” aren’t “the folks in the small towns and rural areas of that other America”, they’re any white who isn’t self-loathing and desirous of their own destruction, regardless of their income. Obama’s remarks were racist, that is the primary thing wrong with them, and “conservatism’s” co-operation in helping the media deflect the controversy away from the racist hatred of whites that defines the modern left to “bitterness” is a classic case of quisling behavior, and a good example of why conservatism is in disarray. Because they are afraid to deal with the real nature of these remarks they have allowed themselves to be channeled into the ineffective tactic of accusing Obama of being an elitist. He’s a racist, from a genocidally racist political movement, his elitism is irrelevant.

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=568#comments

Well argued by Smith. He leaves out the jew behind the left, but he sets it up so the next guy can supply the deeper answer. Instead of prejudicing the full answer, he preps the ground for it. Smith shows the way to argue when you're afraid your remarks will be deleted. You don't necessarily have to say everything, but you must avoid obstructing the way to full understanding by staying on the road, even if you stop short of the destination.

Cowardly Grant Havers Responds - After Ensuring He's Safe From Contradiction

Grant Havers, or Gerbil Havers, as he shall henceforth be known, jumped in and deleted our various responses, and then let us have it.

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/responding_to_my_respondents/

To “Craig”: you may have a point; I shall try to be a civil Christian gentleman (no, seriously).
As for T2.0: while I agree with Taki that Sartre was a better fornicator than philosopher, he was correct to observe that if “the Jew did not exist, the anti-Semite would have to invent him.” There would be no meaning to this pathetic thug’s life if takimag didn’t exist. If the paleos, the zionists, the whole world are so horrible, why does this cretin bother?

Posted by Grant Havers on Apr 15, 2008.

Part gerbil, part pufferfish, our Granty. Why do you bother censoring cretins, Grant? Afraid you can't beat them in argument?

As for Sartre's line, it's just another character smear. Which is fine with you. Lacking all principles, you have no problem citing a jew who defended his jew commie brothers over in Russia who murdered tens of millions of Whites. He's a jew, that's all that matters to you. No one can call you an anti-semite if you quote him. You're safe. And that's your thing, isn't it, Granty?

All the Takimag reader notices is that:

Paleocons allow jews to smear Whites, but don't allow Whites to rebut jewish lies with facts.

Hey, Gerbil Havers: if jews didn't exist, who would you philosemitic cower-cons truckle before? You'd have to invent a new master.

Censored at Takimag!

Here's what you can't post on a site run by conservative profiteers.

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/responding_to_my_respondents/



Executive summary: profesional paleoconservatives are career girls. They cut their analysis to fit their interests. Jew Gottfried’s mission and function is to prevent young white intellectuals from identifying the jews at the root of every major social ill bedeviling the Whites’ West.

Extended response:
http://takimag.blogspot.com/2008/04/jew-saul-gottfrieds-mission-steering.html
Posted by T2.0 on Apr 15, 2008.


There is a lot blame to go around. Why let the Christian Zionist off the hook?

White nationalists like me attack all bought preachers, but bought preachers are a symptom, not the disease itself.

Jewish neocons can only get away with what the majority Christian population of America lets them get away with.

Really?

The majority of White Christian America was against our involvement in what became WWII. Nearly 90%. Yet we went in. How do you explain that save a hostile minority makes all the real decisions?

The vast majority of the country, Christians included, wants the borders shut down. Yet they remain open. It wants an end to affirmative action, yet it never stops. What the majority wants doesn’t matter in the least. What the jews want is what happens. Why should comments be deleted from a conservative site for saying this if it isn’t true? If what I were arguing were wrong, it could be demonstrated by the editors. But instead they censor because the truth makes them look like what they are pseudo-analysts.

Say you’re a christian preacher who doesn’t want the jews to “get away with” any of 500 policies any longer. Where do you get your view publicized? All the mass media outlets are owned by jews and push the jewish agenda. Anyone who objects is smeared as a hater. There are individual christian preachers who stand up, but you sure won’t hear about Ted Pike at Takimag! You have to go to the white nationalist media to learn about him and them.

An academic who did the research proving that jews are pursuing a genocidal campaign against Whites just had a conference held in his honor. I refer to Kevin MacDonald and the SPLC-led witch hunt roundup at Long Beach the other day. Not a word of it transpired here. Why? Because this is la-la land, where everything’s about policies and people, and racial agendas are out of bounds. Nevertheless, jews pursuing genocidal policies against native Whites is what defines America and most of the West today.

If it were a simple matter of Christians choosing to get rid of the jews if they wanted, my comments here would not be deleted so quickly. White nationalism is precisely what the jew fears: Whites who understand they are under racial attack and fight back rather than look for reasons to explain away what is obvious, as the paleocons do.

There are the rare Christians who speak against the jews. They are marginalized. Not by their own - by the jews who run the government and can yank tax exemptions as one in a number of tools they have for cutting funding to anyone who opposes their genocial, loxist agenda.

These clowns you see out front - Reed, Falwell, Robertson - these are men who have power ONLY because they have sold out to the jews. If Pat Robertson took a line critical of Israel he’d be off tv within days.

You have it backwards, McGinty. The jews have the power. They control the christians through tax status (money) and threats.

Essentially, Whites are denied a head. Just as their jewish brothers did in Eastern Europe last century, murdering the White elites, jews in America use their power to prevent a White head from forming, leaving the headless body fit to fight in Iraq, work a service job, or produce white daughters for negroes to marry lol.

The majority Christian population could end the neocon teason in heart beat if they wanted to. This is the paradox.

So you say. The facts are otherwise. Or are christians simply to gutless to point out that it is jews who are behind the campaign to knock christianity out of the public square, and jews who fill their tvs with MTV and Nickelodeon race-mixing garbage, and their retail stores with Bratz dolls.

The only political question that matters in America today is whether, despite the powers the jews can leverage, good White men can come together and cashier them, and create a society worth living in.

In America 2008, all you need to predict what’s going to happen is a knowledge of the jewish agenda. What the majority wants never matters. Paleocons, who must at all cost preserve their income, can’t afford to tell you the facts. They’re happy with crumbs from the liberal jew table in exchange for toeing the Big Lie line that race doesn’t matter.

Posted by T2.0 on Apr 15, 2008.


The White race—those who wish to survive as Whites in a White nation—have not yet resorted to violence to end Jewish Tyranny, but I believe that day is coming. The jews who run our country have made peaceful change inevitable, and in time they will get done to them what they claim Hitler did, but in fact did not do.

Posted by Mark Schlachter on Apr 15, 2008.


That ‘inevitable’ should be IMPOSSIBLE, per the Kennedy quotation.
Posted by Mark Schlachter on Apr 15, 2008.




The US got invloved in WW2 because Germany declared war on the US. There was no opposition to the war at this point.

Yes, after endless provocation and mistreatment under the banner of neutrality. Germany had absolutely no way to threaten the North American mainland, and we were far better served to stay out of that war to extend jewish communism.

But still, McGinty - if the Germans got what they deserved, then why are you here? We normal Whites in America are getting it too. Just as it was in the Weimar Hitler objected to, we in America today have degenerate jews with their hands on all our cultural chokepoints. They are using their control to murder our country, and eliminate our people.

Only the jew won World War Two.

What do you think multiculturalism is? It’s a policy deliberately created by jews to produce White genocide. I thought Hitler was the racist? I thought he killed all the jews? No, in fact all he did was encourage them to emigrate. The real genocidalists are the jews who claim to be the victims of genocide. If you don’t understand that, you need to do a little more reading. Or commit menticide and join Free Republic.

Posted by T2.0 on Apr 15, 2008.

Good Question

I’m a big fan of Justin Raimondo. Is it too much to hope for that Takimag will offer Dennis ‘n’ Yoshi bobblehead dolls?

Posted by Boyd Brown on Apr 15, 2008.

Jew Saul Gottfried's Mission: Steering Young White Conservative Intellectuals Away From Jew-Knowledge


Responding to My Respondents
Posted by Paul Gottfried on April 15, 2008

My last full-length essay on Taki evoked so many thoughtful comments, including essays by Daniel Larison and Richard Spencer (and a long opinion piece by Gerald Russello on the American Conservative website) that I am producing this detailed clarification. The critical thrust of the comments received was more or less the following: First of all, I have overstated the difference between the paleoconservatives and the younger generation of those who are attacking the neoconservatives from the right. Both groups have said pretty much the same things about the evils of the welfare state, the folly of basing a foreign policy on Wilsonian rhetoric, and the leftist origins and cosmology of the neoconservative rulers of the “conservative movement.” There is no significant distinction to be drawn among right-wingers based on generational differences. Where they differ, according to Russello, is that paleos show a deeper knowledge of philosophy and history than those who are coming after them. That difference indicates a greater intellectual reach on the part of the paleos, who have managed to be more than “journalists and activists.”

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/responding_to_my_respondents/


On and on, boringer and boringer with each paragraph. A man who writes the way jew Gottfried does has one or two purposes: to make money; to deceive. There is no substantial difference between professional conservatives today and yesterday. They are career girls. It is the most distinctive characteristic of the class. Even Canny Sammy, the race-daringest of them all, was a career girl rather than a radical, let alone a revolutionary. A career girl is defined as someone who never puts a cause ahead of his personal interests. As Oliver North said, the truth never put any food on anyone's table. Paleoconservatives don't buck the System, they are the System. Not, of course, all of it, or the part that defines the whole, but a prop. Paleoconservatives lend support to ZOG's anti-White System by misleading their readers as to the root cause of the Right's, taken in its loosest sense, litany of woes. Cultural degeneration, open borders, immoral foreign wars, racial crime, affirmative action - all these policies or results of policies can be traced to jews. If these same jews are in positions of power, and they are, and their fellows like Gottfried never discuss them, and they avoid it as far as they possibly can, given they're on the right where in spite of all best intentions these dirty little secrets still pop up, then jews like Gottfried must be taken as an integral part of the System they affect to seek to change.

Professional conservatism is inseparable from dickering over details since discussing the tenets of the system they whine about is taboo. The System known as America is built on the suppression of White identity. To defend itself the System nibbles and bites at free speech and self-defense rights secured in the White-devised Constitution. That is obvious. Less obvious is that the System sustains itself by creating, and thereby controlling, its own opposition. This is where shielding jews such as Paul Gottfried come in. Always jew Gottfried concern is to lead his charges away from the jewish connection to our troubles. Always the jew conceals or, if he can't do that, downplays the demonstrably true conception that our real rulers are jews driven by an ethnic agenda that includes genocide for Whites. Always jew Gottfried blames Protestants and the managerial state, while ignoring his fellow jews' stated words about their motives and aims.

Young conservatives assimilate into a System that tacitly accepts jews as the touchstone for all values. No view of history is acceptable unless some jew approves. The neocons have their Jaffa, dictating the official party line on Lincoln. But the paleocons have their Lukacs, dictating the party line on race and nationalism. All that remains to be done is to use the smears and epithets honed by their brother jews on the left to denounce any budding paleo-brain who dares to color outside the established lines.

Taki says he began Takimag to take on the neocons, but all he has done is establish a variant of their orthodoxy that is every bit as totalitarian in shutting out dissenting views. If racial strife between jews and Whites is at the heart of the struggle over the future of the Whites' West, you will never hear of it at Takimag, where discussion is limited to what jews deem safe, respectable, responsible, appropriate - whichever word they want to use as an excuse to get out of debating first principles.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Celebrating The Goat

















Just because...

Grant Havers, Paleocon Coward

So ol' Grant responds to my calling him out:

It’s so sad that Neo-Nazi agent provocateurs lack the guts to post their real names, and must steal the good name of Taku. The “master race” is cowardly and moronic in equal doses.

Posted by Grant Havers on Apr 14, 2008.


When I responded by posting my name, location and phone number:

It’s so sad that Neo-Nazi agent provocateurs lack the guts to post their real names, and must steal the good name of Taku. The “master race” is cowardly and moronic in equal doses.

Posted by Grant Havers on Apr 14, 2008.

Alex Linder
Kirksville, Missouri
660 665 8210

I posted first under my own name many times, making factual, substantial posts. No insults. All posts were deleted.

You’re the coward, Havers. Like your boss and the jews who run him.

Posted by TPP on Apr 14, 2008.

Grant Havers waited maybe an hour and then deleted it.

Like I say,

Paleocons are cowards and boughtlings.

There is no honor in them.

That's why they have no troubling toeing the jewish party line, even as they know it means the death of their kind and their country - the very things their philosophy tells them to protect.

As Joe Sobran said about Grant Havers and his ilk, "It was all a game, a way of making a living."

Immigration: The Facts Paleocons Don't Want Known

[Here’s a good example. This is a cut from a PhD essay proving that jews were the only force consistently pushing for a reversal of our White immigration policy. The desired reversal was achieved in 1965 and, well, you see the results. It means DEATH by chocolate for your posterity, which is exactly what the jews who build walls around Israel desire.]

The defeats of 1924 and 1952 did not prevent the ultimate victory of the Jewish interest in combating the cultural, political, and demographic dominance of the European-derived peoples of the United States. What is truly remarkable is the tenacity with which Jewish ethnic interests were pursued for a period of close to 100 years. Also remarkable was the ability to frame the argument of immigration-restrictionists in terms of racial superiority in the period from 1924-1965 rather than in such positive terms as the ethnic interests of the peoples of northern and western Europe in maintaining a status quo as of 1924.

During the period between 1924 and 1965 Jewish interests were largely thwarted, but this did not prevent the ultimate triumph of the Jewish perspective on immigration. In a very real sense the result of the immigration changes fostered by Jewish intellectual and political activity have constituted a long term victory over the political, demographic, and cultural representation of ‘the common people of the South and West’ (Higham 1984, 49) whose congressional delegates were in the forefront of the restrictionist forces.

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/books-immigration.html

Posted by Tkimag2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.

Misrepresenting Jews to Christians: It's What Paleocons Do


Responding to my critics
Posted by Grant Havers on April 12, 2008

It appears that many of my readers are under the misapprehension that I was unfair to the pagan tradition, which undeniably contributed to the richness of Western civilization.


http://www.takimag.com/sniperstower/article/pagans_are_devout_straussians_not_so_much/


2) His insight that both Jews and Christians must live up to moral duties (love thine enemy, love the stranger) which are unthinkable to pagan cultures.

You really are full of shit.

Jews are under absolutely no compunction to love anybody but themselves, and that's just what they do. In fact, rabbis encourage jews to spit every time they pass a church. The old testament is nothing but jews running around murdering whoever their shit-god tells them to. Every holiday jews have is a celebration of their genocide of yet another hated nation. To jews, the world divides into two groups: the chosen, and anti-semites.

But keep lying to the rubes that jews are just like you and me, you piece of shit.

Here's a quotation from Ari Sharon Twinky McHavers won't be using anytime soon:


“We are Judeo-Nazis, and why not? If your nice, civilized parents, rather than writing books about their love for humanity had instead come to Israel and killed six million Arabs, what would have happened? Sure, two or three nasty pages would have been written in the history books, and we would have been called all sorts of names, but we would be here today as a people of 25 million! What you don’t understand is that the dirty work of Zionism is not finished yet, far from it.”—Ariel Sharon


Ariel Sharon is a real jew, not some paleo twink who has to appease them to earn his daily bread.

If you subtract hate and racism from judaism there isn't anything left.

Posted by Tim Fuller on Apr 14, 2008.


Hey, Aaron, you wouldn’t by any chance be a jew, now, would you?

You know a member of the tribe known as nation-wreckers for the last 2,000 years?

And if you are a jew, why aren’t you labeled as such? Maybe yellow stars are passe, so a nice skull and bones poison alert will do.

The view that America was a hodgepodge of various nationalities and was not comprised of a distinct American nationality would have been deemed preposterous prior to Emma Lazarus.

Precisely.

But who was Emma Lazarus?

A filthy socialist.

But more than that, Emma Lazarus was a jew.

Jews wreck nations. The Romans said that 2,000 years ago. It remains true today. Taki abets these nation-wreckers because he’s a coward and a dilettante.

It seems to me that one can normatively define a nation without having to adhere to ideology or religios/racial/ethnic separatism. For example, one could say that the “U.S. is a Christian nation (a Protestant nation, but with considerable Catholic influence)”; and one could say: “the U.S. is predominantly an Anglo-European nation, but with recognizable minorities of Africans, Mestizos and Native Americans, and that immigration policy should reflect this historic balance.”

Hey, look at this. Is this the same kike polluting this site the way jewess Lazarus polluted the Statue of Liberty?

In 1989 an American-born Jew, Aaron Wolf, wrote a book about his experiences in the Israeli army. On one occasion after the killing of some Arab combatants, says the author, “I cornered Alon, the Chicagoan whose specialty is falling in love and who was one of the men on that patrol. ‘Hey, Alon,’ I said, ‘Tell me something. You’ve been trained as a medic. You’ve had a three-month course learning how to save lives. How do you feel now that you’ve killed somebody?’ ‘How do I feel?’ he said. ‘I feel hungry.’” [WOLF, A., p. 171]

http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/ugly.htm

Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.


Thanks to Dan for writing a follow-up piece.

I had asked for a definition of the “American nation,” if indeed there is one. What appears above, to my eyes at least, is a definition not of a nation but of “nationality.”

“American nationality is a specific historical compound of cultures, religions, lineages, and geography—just like other nations . . . “

I could be wrong, but it seems as if you are shying away from defining the nation per se: Stripped down, it reads “American nationality is a compound like other nations.”

A nation is a people united in some sense by birth, whereas nationality—in the American context, at least—tends toward the abstract. For there to be the sort of “traditional” nationalism that you suggest, there must be a circumscribed nation, one composed of these but not those. That nation will certainly have particular characteristics (a “nationality") but for a people to be “traditionally nationalist,” it must love itself, not a “compound.” “Nationalism” that is characterized by love of such a “compound” is itself ideological. Thus, Lukacs in your citation: “The American idea of nationality has been ideological.”

I see evidence of this in the reference to “our Pilgrim fathers.” If I am part of the “American nationality,” that means that they are my fathers, at least “mythically.” They are not. They are as much my “fathers” as they are the fathers of any illegal Mexican who is willing to love the aforementioned compound.

Posted by Aaron D. Wolf on Apr 14, 2008.



Hey, Aaron, you wouldn’t by any chance be a jew, now, would you?

You know a member of the tribe known as nation-wreckers for the last 2,000 years?

And if you are a jew, why aren’t you labeled as such? Maybe yellow stars are passe, so a nice skull and bones poison alert will do.
Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.






The view that America was a hodgepodge of various nationalities and was not comprised of a distinct American nationality would have been deemed preposterous prior to Emma Lazarus.

Precisely.

But who was Emma Lazarus?

A filthy socialist.

But more than that, Emma Lazarus was a jew.

Jews wreck nations. The Romans said that 2,000 years ago. It remains true today. Taki abets these nation-wreckers because he’s a coward and a dilettante.
Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.



Hey, look at this. Is this the same kike polluting this site the way jewess Lazarus polluted the Statue of Liberty?

In 1989 an American-born Jew, Aaron Wolf, wrote a book about his experiences in the Israeli army. On one occasion after the killing of some Arab combatants, says the author, “I cornered Alon, the Chicagoan whose specialty is falling in love and who was one of the men on that patrol. ‘Hey, Alon,’ I said, ‘Tell me something. You’ve been trained as a medic. You’ve had a three-month course learning how to save lives. How do you feel now that you’ve killed somebody?’ ‘How do I feel?’ he said. ‘I feel hungry.’” [WOLF, A., p. 171]

http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/ugly.htm
Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.




We had a pro-American (read: White) immigration policy in the 20s. Guess which ethnic group went insane trying to change it? That’s right, jews. Then they failed. Four decades later, in 1965, they succeeded. Today we see the results around us.

What Americans think doesn’t matter the least to the jews running the country. They own our Congress, the own our media, and they’re going to do what they damn well please. The only way to fight them is for good White men to stand up against them. Otherwise the express train to the third world will steam ahead.

Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.




It's not just in America either. The jew brother of the jew who drew those ridiculous Maus cartoons was instrumental in using Aboriginal cover to overturn the White Australia policy that kept immigration to that nation White.

Jews everywhere are a threat to Whites. They always pursue the same nation-wrecking policies no matter where they are.

The only conservative solution to America's problems is cashiering the jews who dictate to the rest of us.





Funny how things are these days. Even the conservatives have been brainwashed.

Hate the jews?

You’re darn right I do.

But it doesn’t change the fact that jews are the architects of our open borders, which results in millions of Whites being vicimized by violent crime each

year, and having to pay for these in thousands of ways.

Jews are also the architects of ‘civil rights’ that result in 40,000 White women being raped each year.

I’m not a brainwashed kook like you christian cowards, I defend myself and my kind.

Jews are at war with us, and they are using the blacks and mexicans to destroy our communities. Nothing you say, no prayer you utter, will change the facts.

Fighting back as Whites, against jews, is the only way to effect permanent, positive change.
Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.






Hitler said that America had an unlikely future because it was half-judaized and half-nigger. He said that without ever hearing rap! Look around you and you can see what he meant.

American culture is precisely what ought to be junked. The good part of America is the white genetic material, of which a White nation could be formed - if the jewish dictators were removed and a white nationalist government put in place.

Just imagine what a wonderful country America would be without jews, blacks, or browns.

There’s not a person reading this who wouldn’t push a button to make that happen if he could. The question is why you allows evil jews, christian liars, and conservative boughtlings to talk you out of what you know is right and best.

Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.





It’s so sad that Neo-Nazi agent provocateurs lack the guts to post their real names, and must steal the good name of Taku. The “master race” is cowardly and moronic in equal doses.

Posted by Grant Havers on Apr 14, 2008.

Alex Linder
Kirksville, Missouri
660 665 8210

I posted first under my own name many times, making factual, substantial posts. No insults. All posts were deleted.

You’re the coward, Havers. Like your boss and the jews who run him.
Posted by TPP on Apr 14, 2008.





And who murdered ol’ Jesus, your good buddy?

Was it jews?

Why I bet anything you’re going to share that blame.

That’s how it works. Jews cure one disease, we owe it them. Boy, I sure never heard jews thank us Whites for curing the rest of them.

So go on, Aaron. Who murdered Jesus?

Who said, “his blood be upon us and on our children”?
Posted by A. Linder on Apr 14, 2008.


[main link again - the Takimag 2.0 comments have been erased]
http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/further_notes_on_nationalism/


Mr. Linder - your strange tactics are revolting and unpleasant.

And I find your ways devious and unseemly, earthling.

I understand how pointing out that jews are behind changes in our immigration policy is extremely threatening to those with a vested interest in hiding the facts from honest white men who don’t have the time to track them down themselves.

But if that’s what the facts say, what do I do?

Pretend they don’t exist?

But then I’d be a coward like McCarthy and Havers.

Jews deliberately opened our borders to ‘elect a new people.’ Jews were the only significant pressure group pushing for the 1965 immigration act that turned America into a tarpit.

Jews hate White nations. They work to undermine them. In Australia and Europe just as in America. Those are the facts. They will not go away.

Neither will I.

Notice yet again, it’s not the readers who have a problem with factual, substantial posts. It’s the editors. They’re scared for their careers. They don’t want you to know that they can’t speak freely. They’re pwned by jews, and Takimag is just another liberal rag.

Someone has to point it out.

Posted by tmag2 on Apr 14, 2008.

McCarthy Says Screw You to Founders, I'll Side With The Powerful Jews

Further Notes on Nationalism

Posted by Daniel McCarthy on April 14, 2008

In the comments thread of my nationalism and patriotism piece, Aaron Wolf raises an important question: what is the American nation? Does a conservative nationalism have to be “white nationalism”?

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/further_notes_on_nationalism/


I’ll answer the latter quickly by saying that conservative nationalism cannot be white nationalism, since white nationalism is contrary to the traits of the American character that conservatives want to preserve.

Boom! That's the sound of Daniel McCarthy flinging Thomas Jefferson out the window in the name of his false and jew-afeared conservatism.

Jefferson, like the rest of the founders, knew the truth about race, and he expressed it memorably and for all time when he said:

[The] two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government.

Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.

Why are these comments allowed to stand. Where is Spencer? Get these down now.

Posted by Paul Gottfried on Apr 14, 2008.

Any American nationalist, but especially a conservative one, is going to want to preserve as much as possible of this institutional and cultural patrimony.

Yeah, it has nothing to do with race, because it might hurt your income if you acknowledged it did.

Imagine an ant colony trying to integrate sloths and wolverines, and pretending there was no essential racial difference, it was just a matter of assimilating the sloths and wolverines in line with the cultural and institutional patrimony.

You can only carry off your pseudo-conservative jewish liberalism by denying there’s a genocidal race war being carried out against Whites.

McCarthy, you and your ilk have to look up to see the good men doing nothing. You’re not merely doing nothing, you’re actively aiding the bolshevik jews murdering America.

Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.


The Only Tree Branch Out Of The Tarpit

Three Strategies for the Right
Posted by Daniel McCarthy on April 11, 2008

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/three_strategies_for_the_right/




White identify is the only tree branch out of the tarpit.

Face it. Every group has interests, and every group has advocates and representatives. Except Whites.

How is White identify suppressed? By the jews running the media. They need whites for taxes and cannon fodder. For nothing else. The jews’ mission is to bring about white genocide by means of discrimination and miscegenation, both of which are pushed ruthlessly and around the clock. Look at what your daughters and sons are exposed to on tv and in the classroom. It is neo-Soviet, and it is designed to subdue and scatter your genes to the wind. Paleoconservatism without race is Helper without the hamburger.

The only place White men are treated with respect by our Jewish dictatorship is in commercials trying to recruit them for the military.

Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.