Zamfirak Loves Unaborted 'Lacks

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Responses to Greasy John Zamfirak's Latest Pro-Black Asininity

Are blacks a collective postive or a collective negative? The answer is obvious. But a good Catholic knows never to pose the sensible question, always to move the question into la-la land, where everything is abstract and beautiful. Just as liberals separate liberation and voting from results, they separate abortion from the character of the pail people. It is one thing to abort a black. It is an entirely different thing to abort a White.

A good comment, not by us, gets some of the truth into the thread. Whether the post is let stand, of course, remains to be seen.

http://www.takimag.com/sniperstower/article/kill_the_poor/

Sorry, blacks in general have nothing to contribute to any kind of society I’d like to live in. 90% score lower than the average white on IQ scores and the very few that can succeed work towards making life easier for the rest of them, which means more crime, socialism and social engineering. And blacks aren’t only inferior in intelligence. Mark Levin’s book (http://www.amazon.com/Why-Race-Matters-Michael-Levin/dp/0965638359/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1208387986&sr=8-1) shows that blacks are also morally inferior by the standards of our society at least.

Anyway, the less blacks the better. I won’t miss those who contribute nothing to modern civilization and live as parasites, providing motivation for generation of do gooders to use government power to smother us all to death in the pursuit of their unatainable goal of equality.

Posted by Jason on Apr 16, 2008.

[Our post]

Are blacks a collective postive or a collective negative? The answer is obvious. But a good Catholic knows never to pose the sensible question, always to move the question into la-la land, where everything is abstract and perfect. Just as liberals separate liberation and voting and civil rights from results, they separate abortion from the character of the people in the pail. It is one thing to abort a black. It is an entirely different thing to abort a White. As they used to say, “Not everything with a face is human.”

The John Zmiraks of the world keep preening over their morals while outside in the real world, 37,000 White women are raped by unaborted blacks each year.

I understand that if those blacks be caught young and tutored in the ways of Jesus, these horrors will stop. I’m just sayin’…

Posted by Mark Twine on Apr 16, 2008.

Great Comments: Sempronius boots Patty Bukes

28Sempronius

Where to begin? Buchanan the phoney Catholic and phoney “right wing extremist” has encountered some easy prey and hes not about to forego the opportunity to make shooting a squirrel seem like wrestling a lion.The modern Hercules will surely secure his place, if not on Olympus at least in suburban D.C..

There is nothing wrong with “elites”.In fact any sane person, much less a conservative, aknowledges as much and whats more welcomes it.Populist opposition to elitism is yesterdays Leftism,and yesterdays Leftism is todays Conservatism.

Therein lies a problem.

Degenerate Conservatism cant effectively oppose Leftism because its intellectual underpinnings are derived from the very tradition it makes a show of opposing.With the predictable result that it doesnt succeed in accomplishing much of anything,except providing careers for useless and worthless personages not unlike P.B..

The yokels out in the wilds of Pennsylvania are hardly an edifying sight.Understanding and sympathizing with their plight is assuredly correct and noble,but it is not primarily on their behalf nor for their benefit that we oppose THE GOOD TIDINGS of Leftism and its newest Kenyan-Indonesian Messiah.There is no little irony in the fact that The Kenyans mother came from regions no less despised and no less humiliated than the Province of Pennsylvania.

As I said, there is nothing wrong with elites.What passes for an elite today however is not a true elite but rather a degenerate epicene plutocracy.A greedy, stupid, ugly assortment of sorry specimens whos combined value isnt equal to a pile of refuse.

It is indicative of how low we have fallen that an African is putting on contemptuous airs, openly and without consequence towards white serfs.The proper rejoinder to the Kenyans provocation is to point out that however mean and ignoble Heartland peasants may be, they are still far and away preferable to the simians that infest our urban wastelands not to mention the savages of his beloved Africa.

But Conservatism cant do that you see.That would be racist and therefore unchristian and unamerican.

Unbiblical you might say.

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=568#comments

____________________

[also good]

The elites have power because — and only because — the people have accepted a servile status in exchange for security & benefits.

McCarthy Says Screw You to Founders, I'll Side With The Powerful Jews

Further Notes on Nationalism

Posted by Daniel McCarthy on April 14, 2008

In the comments thread of my nationalism and patriotism piece, Aaron Wolf raises an important question: what is the American nation? Does a conservative nationalism have to be “white nationalism”?

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/further_notes_on_nationalism/

I’ll answer the latter quickly by saying that conservative nationalism cannot be white nationalism, since white nationalism is contrary to the traits of the American character that conservatives want to preserve.

Boom! That's the sound of Daniel McCarthy flinging Thomas Jefferson out the window in the name of his false and jew-afeared conservatism.

Jefferson, like the rest of the founders, knew the truth about race, and he expressed it memorably and for all time when he said:

[The] two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government.

Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.

Why are these comments allowed to stand. Where is Spencer? Get these down now.

Posted by Paul Gottfried on Apr 14, 2008.

Any American nationalist, but especially a conservative one, is going to want to preserve as much as possible of this institutional and cultural patrimony.

Yeah, it has nothing to do with race, because it might hurt your income if you acknowledged it did.

Imagine an ant colony trying to integrate sloths and wolverines, and pretending there was no essential racial difference, it was just a matter of assimilating the sloths and wolverines in line with the cultural and institutional patrimony.

You can only carry off your pseudo-conservative jewish liberalism by denying there’s a genocidal race war being carried out against Whites.

McCarthy, you and your ilk have to look up to see the good men doing nothing. You’re not merely doing nothing, you’re actively aiding the bolshevik jews murdering America.

Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.

The Only Tree Branch Out Of The Tarpit

Three Strategies for the Right
Posted by Daniel McCarthy on April 11, 2008

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/three_strategies_for_the_right/

White identify is the only tree branch out of the tarpit.

Face it. Every group has interests, and every group has advocates and representatives. Except Whites.

How is White identify suppressed? By the jews running the media. They need whites for taxes and cannon fodder. For nothing else. The jews’ mission is to bring about white genocide by means of discrimination and miscegenation, both of which are pushed ruthlessly and around the clock. Look at what your daughters and sons are exposed to on tv and in the classroom. It is neo-Soviet, and it is designed to subdue and scatter your genes to the wind. Paleoconservatism without race is Helper without the hamburger.

The only place White men are treated with respect by our Jewish dictatorship is in commercials trying to recruit them for the military.

Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.

Orwell and the Vaunted, Artificial Distinction Between Nationalism and Patriotism

The distinction between nationalism and patriotism is merely jews attempting to say what's good when they do it is evil when you do it. America is run by jews, so our nationalism is veiled jewish nationalism. That's why our enemies in Iraq call our soldiers jews. They know who our boys are really fighting for, whereas our boys often don't. At least not until they get there.

The jews lie that white nationalists are evil, hateful extremists who want to roll back civil rights. But if the price of civil rights, as the jews euphemistically describe their dictatorship, is 40,000 White women raped each year by liberated blacks, then civil rights is no more than terrorism by a pretty name. And of course, the rapes are but one of a thousand negatives springing from the jewish communist takeover in the mid-sixties.


Abusing Patriotism
Posted by Daniel Larison on April 14, 2008

Dan has written a strong case against the criticisms of nationalism that I and others have leveled in recent weeks, and I have already responded to some of his points elsewhere, but in this post I want to address the criticisms of Orwell’s overly broad definition of nationalism. Then in the next post I will consider this idea of “hubristic patriotism” and specifically the claim that the attack on paleoconservatives for their lack of patriotism was enabled by such a “hubristic patriotism.”

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/abusing_patriotism/

Yeah, lots of words here.

You’re correct that Orwell was assing when he conjured distinctions that were matters of opinion rather than fact.

Nationalism that matters is based on race. And it’s about self-protection, not slaughtering others. Well, White nationalism, that is. Jewish nationalism, which is the nationalism of the ruling power + the Freepertards is what you’re against. You just won’t name it properly.

White nationalism advocates racial separatism as a cure for the degeneracy of the multicultural failure jews have made of America. It advocates and end to the terrorism called called civil rights that sees 40,000 White women raped by blacks EACH YEAR.

Jewish nationalism, by contrast, is all about expanding Israel’s territory and humiliating anyone jews gain control over.

Posted by Takimag 2.0 on Apr 14, 2008.

Anti-Northern Bigotry Trips Up Clyde "The Goat" Wilson

Clyde Wilson slips into his dotage muttering imprecations against the Evil Yankee, a category that seems to entail everyone north of him, and everyone to his south, east, or west he doesn't like. So far gone is he that he has asserted at Chronicles that America doesn't have a negro problem, it has a Northerner problem. Imagine an actual working class white guy who lived in a mixed neighborhood saying something that dumb. Unthinkable. Only high-IQ guys can make statements that stupid. But what is ordinary White behavior next to Southronist ideology? The Goat baahs; the facts yield.

Below is a variant of his theme. The original post, by Piatek, was about the decline of Detroit, which roughly 34/35 Chronically Correct Comment-droppers dutifully attributed to culture and economics rather than race. Only one made the classic mistake, satirically, of linking the former Paris of Middle America's untergang to blacks being blacks. Then ol' Clyde chipped in with this:

32Clyde Wilson

Why does this sort of thing happen in places like Detroit but not in evil backward places like South Carolina and Mississippi?

He promptly got his ass kicked.

33scott

Go to city-data.com and check out their list of the “top 100 least-safe cities (pop. 5000+).” Detroit is #30. Lancaster, S.C is #8 and Lake City, S.C. is #27. Atlanta is #13. Six of the “top 100 least safe cities” are in South Carolina, and most are in the South. In 2004, according to the census bureau, South Carolina had the highest violent crime rate of any U.S. state despite not having a single large city.

Although Southern whites on average are more violent and criminal than Northern whites, the primary reason for such facts is obvious to anyone with even a modicum of realism and honesty. Thomas Sowell and Prof. Wilson are both wrong in emphasizing culture. Neither “rednecks” nor “yankees” are to blame for the unique criminal tendencies of blacks. Blacks are blacks, whether they live in Detroit, South Carolina, Toronto, Haiti, London, Brazil, or darkest Africa.

Ouch. I would like to think The Goat retains a modicum of realism and honesty, but I can't prove it by his words concerning anything within a stone's throw of the penumbras emanating from any discussion involving race.

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=559#comments

Better to ditch The Goat and instead take up his collection of John Calhoun's words. Calhoun knew from nigger, even though he was educated in the North. Too bad we can't bring the Iron Man back to life and stick him in front of The Goat and ask Wilson to repeat his foolish words. There's nothing worse than seeing an old man blanch and blush. Let us draw the veil of mercy over the scene.

Come on, Clyde. You can do better.